David Teigland wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:30:31AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > >>meh.. not too long ago i was told to use U1 :) even if the development >>model for this project was explained to me, i still find it confusing. >> >>My understanding was that there are N branches (other than head) that >>should have the same userland and differ only for the kernel side that >>are (of course) tuned for the specific release. >> >>Wouldn't be an option to rearrange the repository to make it simpler? I >>also noticed quite a bunch of people with my same issue, often asking >>questions on IRC on what branch to use. > > > The confusion is our fault. The essential problem here is that we aren't > doing proper, versioned, tarball releases of the cluster tree (like every > other project.) Having everyone use cvs is wrong. We're working on > fixing this; it's slow because not everyone recognizes the problem yet. I understand.. thanks for the explanation. Now my next question is: what can I do to help? I don't want to just sit and looklike an asker/ranter ;) I falled in love with this project making it available in Ubuntu, and i would like to contribute more if possible. Thanks Fabio -- no signature file found. -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
