On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Lon Hohberger wrote:
Interesting.
If you had 5 physical machines, you could have xen0 be the lock_gulm
master and only have xenU access the GFS volumes acting as clients.
Doing it this way should theoretically allow 2 physical boxes to fail
and any number of xenUs fail...
So with lock_gulm, I couldn't run the 4 xen0's as lock_gulm masters, and
lose two?
I do have a fifth box (firewall) that I could probably also run as a
lock_gulm master. Maybe I should consider that.. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| nate carlson | natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
