Wouldn't each lock in GFS be used to impliment some sort of filesystem-level lock, such as an fcntl() or flock(), which would in turn belong to a process? On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:39 -0500, Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:12:51PM -0500, Andrew C. Dingman wrote: > > Using GFS 6 on RHEL3, is there any way to determine which locks are held > > by a particular node, or better yet by a process on that node? > > send a USR1 signal to the LT process, this will dump a snapshot of the > entire lockspace into /tmp/Gulm_LT_Lock_Dump.LT000.?????? (the ? will be > random chars.) > `gulm_tool getstats localhost:lt000 | grep pid` will tell you the pid > of the LT000 process. > > There isn't a way to see what processes hold locks because processes > don't hold locks. GFS holds locks, not processes. > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
