On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 23:48 -0400, Coman Iliut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently have two servers with gfs/cman/dlm, but I also use the HA
> or "heartbeat" packeg to implement an active/passive design with IP
> takeover.
>
> Can I use cman for this instead of the heartbeat package?
>
> There are a number of overlaps between the cman/ccs and HA/heartbeat.
> For example, both packages send heartbeats. Also, both gfs and HA try
> to do fencing, gfs via fence_tool, and HA with STONITH (shoot the
> other node in the head).
>
> I would really like to use only cman if possible.
Add/edit the <rm> tag:
<rm>
<resources>
<ip address="192.168.76.28" monitor_link="yes"/>
</resources>
<service name="example1">
<ip ref="192.168.76.28"/>
</service>
<service name="example2">
<ip address="192.168.76.29" monitor_link="yes"/>
</service>
</rm>
In example 1, the IP is defined as a global resource which can then be
used by a service (and reassigned, if so desired).
In example 2, the IP is defined as a private resource for the service.
They're functionally equivalent in this case.
-- Lon
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
