Re: Can I use cman instead of the HA (HighAvailability) package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




/etc/hosts
==========================
192.168.1.11      node1
192.168.1.12      node2
192.168.1.13      node3
192.168.1.101    node1-ic
192.168.1.102    node2-ic
192.168.1.103    node3-ic

I think it would be far better to use a separate subnet for the Gb links. It would make it much easier to know that the packets get routed correctly.

--
birger

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux