On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:46:07AM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > Probably the GFS DLM is more sophisticated than the OCFS2 one, however > they also went that step further and exported it as "dlmfs". Maybe > that's something you could steal from them? Sure, the mechanism used to export the locking API to user space is pretty inconsequential. We're doing reads/writes on a misc device at the moment (used through libdlm of course.) Going through an fs might be better but I'm not sure why. -- Dave Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
