On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:24:23PM -0400, Brian Stevens wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 16:40, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 09:36:26AM -0400, Brian Stevens wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:18, Jeff wrote: > > > > Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 2:53:26 PM, Villalovos, John L wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 21:08, Villalovos, John L wrote: > > > > > > > Are there any plans to try to get the cluster stack into > > > > > > > RHEL 4? Looking at the current RHEL 4 Beta I did not > > > > > > > see it in there. > > > > > > > > > > > > John - The GFS and HA components of the cluster stack are > > > > > > layered on RHEL 3 today, and the new versions being > > > > > > developed will be similarly layered on RHEL 4. So these > > > > > > are additive subscriptions, similar to app server, devel > > > > > > environment, etc. > > > > > RHEL today actually comes in 4 flavors: desktop, workstation, > > > small server, and large server. Each has a different service > > > level agreement, costs different appropriately, etc. Things like > > > clustering were layered so you could use on top of whatever RHEL > > > version that meets your needs. > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to get GFS tested in RHEL4's beta > > programme, too, independent of the later product packaging? > > Yes, but the schedules are tied hard together. GFS/CLVM readiness > won't hold up RHEL 4 schedule. > > > At least the currently shipped RHEL4 kernel rpm needs patching to > > allow for GFS' hooks (the cluster-wide-lock patches are required). > > > > It would be nice to see GFS in beta2 or perhaps in its own right > > under a layered beta (even w/o configuration GUIs)? > > It will be a layered beta on RHEL 4, my assumption is beta 2. Any news on this? Will there be a beta for GFS on RHEL4? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpR51twuMkhW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
