RE: [Linux-cluster] GFS 6.0 Questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



GFS-6.0.0-7.1
At least, those are the RPMs currently on the box. We -are- planning an upgrade, but can move that forward if this bug is known to have been fixed in a newer version of 6.0.

yay. I found a bug.

--
Jerry Gilyeat, RHCE
Systems Administrator
Molecular Microbiology and Immunology
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health



-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
Sent: Tue 2/15/2005 3:00 PM
To: linux clistering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS 6.0 Questions
 
Gerald G. Gilyeat wrote:

> Unless I'm mis-reading this, the lt_high_locks directive didn't do
> anything,

you read that right.  damn.  a bug.  I'll look into it.

Just to make sure I'm on the right page, which version are you running?


-- 
michael conrad tadpol tilstra
<WIT, DOOM!>

<<winmail.dat>>


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux