On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 06:33:33PM +0000, linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I'm one of those people that like to find out if I can break things, and I want to find out if what I'm about to do has been tested at all.... > > Basically I'm about to shift from shared (sort of, long story but basically the hardware doesn't work) SCSI, to FCAL storage (hardware raid). > > All good (I think) so far. > > However, I've got my 2 PCs and a SunBlade 100. The Sunblade was originally intended to do something else, but is now free. Therefore I'm tempted to try to create a 3 node cluster using 2 PCs and an UltraSparc based computer > > This means (I think), that I'm going to be trying to access the same data from not only a different CPU size (32 bit and 64 bit) but also, if I remember correctly, big endian and little endian. > > So, is anyone else out there sick enough to have tried this? Is the cluster framework going to work, and/or gfs? > The cluster framework /should/ work with different architectures. I've tested it with intel,sparc & alpha boxes - but not much! I don't know about GFS itself though, I don't have shared storage at home :) -- patrick
