On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 11:24:21AM +0200, Lazar Obradovic wrote: > On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 09:20, David Teigland wrote: > > Thanks, lock_dlm was freeing some posix-lock related structs too early. > > It's fixed in cvs; I think that's your problem. > > Thanks David, > > is "leaking" also fixed with this patch, or is it a separate bug? > > How about that ll_rw_blk thing? I believe all three of the cases you showed were this same root problem. The machine continues to run after the oops which means various unrelated errors start appearing. -- Dave Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
