[Linux-cluster] GFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Linux-cluster] GFS
From: Patrick <nawtyness@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:35:27 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=omEdv48oNk5odlSgBi1WS+nujrC/J2PcFLneymq/6akrIMne8+xkhzi1U660pXjWCg/ooXVGsG1hErwCF9AD6vvqMy3rpdT9DQC0A71dZS6Ynw5MW+T/fdaiu78B1Qr/qm7Ph/2AWM4j9JNxbAxtFt9VGRdTDLjV2V4eqnrzV7I=
Reply-to: Patrick <nawtyness@xxxxxxxxx>, linux clistering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi, 

Would GFS be able to handle ( or how would i check ) say 10 or more
machines over a san ( IBM FAST T600 ) running a web / mail / i/o
dependant system ?

Thanks
-- 
</N>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS
  - From: Adam Cassar

Prev by Date: Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: Csnap instantiation and failover using libdlm
Next by Date: Re: [Linux-cluster] ports used by Cluster Suite
Previous by thread: [Linux-cluster] oprofile results for rm -rf
Next by thread: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Corosync Cluster Engine] [GFS] [Linux Virtualization] [Centos Virtualization] [Centos] [Linux RAID] [Fedora Users] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux