On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:40:07AM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Wednesday 13 October 2004 11:10, you wrote: > > > struct dlm_lksb *lksb; > > > > This should point to something. > > Thanks Patrick, just a little too bleary-eyed to see that right away... > OK, here is the little libdlm demo that grabs and releases a lock, > without the benefit of the dumbed-down pthreads interface, including > forking off a thread to run the dispatch function. This should make > things a little easier for the next innocent victim to head into this > part of the woods. I think I'll put it in the doc directory I think, it might stand more chance of being found. But then given how out-of-date the doc file was...maybe not! > I'd like to encourage you to divide up libdlm as you suggested, there's > no way of getting rid of libpthread otherwise, not to mention that real > men only write reentrant code ;-) Yes. I'll add it to my TODO list, it shouldn't really take too long. -- patrick
