On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 12:08, Lon Hohberger wrote: > Ironically, it's a similar model to having the csnap server running on > all nodes and having rgmanager activate/deactivate the master server, > but should be much faster. Furthermore, it eliminates the need for > rgmanager (or any CRM, really) entirely. The obvious shortcoming is that there's no associated IP address which is moved with the csnap master server. As far as I know, the design of the csnap master server is that you don't need this anyway. -- Lon
