Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS Locking questions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 04:56:46PM -0600, Matthew B. Brookover wrote:

> Similar problems happen if you run readlock and writelock on the same
> host.

The code in cvs now correctly sets EAGAIN for SETLK.

There are more fixes and improvements for posix locks that require a 2.6.9
rc kernel.  I'm not sure to what extent they may help you.  These are the
changes for gfs, lock_harness, lock_dlm and lock_nolock if you'd like to
try.  The patch is against the current cvs:

http://people.redhat.com/~teigland/plock-2.6.9.patch

-- 
Dave Teigland  <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux