On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:07:22AM -0700, John Cherry wrote: > I understand that subversion is quite nice, but kernel developers have > adopted bitkeeper (at least Linus and several of his maintainers). > While you may not need all the distributed capabilities of bitkeeper > now, it is sure nice to have a tool that allows for non-local > repositories and change set tracking outside of the main repository (as > Kevin so clearly stated). Do you think, redhat will provide bk licenses for people which don't get a free one? I'm a subversion and svk developer and will not get one because of this. Bastian -- Without freedom of choice there is no creativity. -- Kirk, "The return of the Archons", stardate 3157.4
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
