Re: [Linux-cluster] [PATCH]: avoid local_nodeid conflict with ia64/numa define

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of clustering software components including GFS <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] [PATCH]: avoid local_nodeid conflict with ia64/numa define
From: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 09:46:28 +0100
In-reply-to: <200408310135.32411.arekm@pld-linux.org>
References: <200408310135.32411.arekm@pld-linux.org>
Reply-to: Discussion of clustering software components including GFS <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Patrick <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i

On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:35:32AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> 
> Little patch by qboosh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> 
> - avoid local_nodeid conflict with ia64/numa define
> 
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/linux-cluster-dlm.patch?r1=1.1.2.3&r2=1.1.2.4
> 

Thanks, I'll apply that.

-- 

patrick

References:
- [Linux-cluster] [PATCH]: avoid local_nodeid conflict with ia64/numa define
  - From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz

Prev by Date: Re: [Linux-cluster] repeatable assertion failure, what does it mean?
Next by Date: RE: [Linux-cluster] Persistent lock question for GDLM
Previous by thread: [Linux-cluster] [PATCH]: avoid local_nodeid conflict with ia64/numa define
Next by thread: [Linux-cluster] repeatable assertion failure extending file system while active
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Corosync Cluster Engine] [GFS] [Linux Virtualization] [Centos Virtualization] [Centos] [Linux RAID] [Fedora Users] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux