Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS 2Tb limit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:53:34AM +0100, Stephen Willey wrote:
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
>   <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
>   <title></title>
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> <blockquote cite="mid20040901152439.GZ5492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" type="cite">
>   <pre wrap="">On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 12:31:41PM +0100, Stephen Willey wrote:
>   </pre>
>   <blockquote type="cite">
>     <pre wrap="">There was a post a while back asking about 2Tb limits and the consensus 
> was that with 2.6 you should be able to exceed the 2Tb limit with GFS.  
> I've been trying several ways to get GFS working including using 
> software raidtabs and LVM (seperately :) ) and everytime I try to use 
> mkfs.gfs on a block device larger than 2Tb I get the following:

You seem to need help controlling your MUA. Anyway, AFAIK it's not
really an issue of scalability, just plain old bugs.

-- wli


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux