On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:56:47AM -0500, Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra wrote:
...
>
> um. possibly means I've been looking in the wrong place for the
> solution. I'll dig in some more, but if anyone else reading this has
> ideas, please share.
newbie (not kernel hacker) idea (taken from the XFS mailing list)
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 08:52:40AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> what does your ffs() look like? I added this patch to our kernels, but
> it may not be in Dan's kernels (hm, I need to update the 1.3.3 packages
> we have on oss...)
>
> --- linux/include/asm-x86_64/bitops.h.orig 2004-07-26
> 12:33:54.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/bitops.h 2004-07-26 12:35:23.000000000 -0500
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static __inline__ int ffs(int x)
>
> __asm__("bsfl %1,%0\n\t"
> "cmovzl %2,%0"
> - : "=r" (r) : "g" (x), "r" (32));
> + : "=r" (r) : "rm" (x), "r" (-1));
> return r+1;
> }
just .02 cents (no flame please)
Tru
