Please disregard my last post. Too quick of a scan; thought you were referring to the pubilc CVS branch. On Tuesday 03 August 2004 10:49, Derek Anderson wrote: > Bernd, > > Please see http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128635. > There are some outstanding fence issues here. > > On Tuesday 03 August 2004 06:55, Schumacher, Bernd wrote: > > Hi, > > I have three nodes oben, mitte and unten. > > > > Test: > > I have disabled eth0 on mitte, so that mitte will be excluded. > > > > Result: > > Oben and unten are trying to fence mitte and build a new cluster. OK! > > But mitte tries to fence oben and unten. PROBLEM! > > > > Why can this happen? Mitte knows that it can not build a cluster. See > > Logfile from mitte: "Have 1, need 2" > > > > Logfile from mitte: > > Aug 3 12:53:17 mitte lock_gulmd_core[1845]: Client (oben) expired Aug > > 3 12:53:17 mitte lock_gulmd_core[1845]: Core lost slave quorum. Have 1, > > need 2. Switching to Arbitrating. Aug 3 12:53:17 mitte > > lock_gulmd_core[2120]: Gonna exec fence_node oben Aug 3 12:53:17 mitte > > lock_gulmd_core[1845]: Forked [2120] fence_node oben with a 0 pause. Aug > > 3 12:53:17 mitte fence_node[2120]: Performing fence method, manual, on > > oben. > > > > cluster.ccs: > > cluster { > > name = "tom" > > lock_gulm { > > servers = ["oben", "mitte", "unten"] > > } > > } > > > > fence.ccs: > > fence_devices { > > manual_oben { > > agent = "fence_manual" > > } > > manual_mitte ... > > > > > > nodes.ccs: > > nodes { > > oben { > > ip_interfaces { > > eth0 = "192.168.100.241" > > } > > fence { > > manual { > > manual_oben { > > ipaddr = "192.168.100.241" > > } > > } > > } > > } > > mitte ... > > > > regards > > Bernd Schumacher > > > > -- > > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
