On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:57:03AM -0400, Jeff wrote: > Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 11:38:40 AM, David Teigland wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:15:17AM -0400, Jeff wrote: > >> dlm_unlock() is documented as being asynchronous and it > >> takes an astarg as one of its arguments. However it does > >> not take an AST routine as an argument. > >> > >> What routine gets executed when an unlock completes? > > > The AST routine from dlm_lock() is saved and used for dlm_unlock(). > > This makes it difficult to update an application which works > with other DLM's as all the completion AST routines need to be > updated to test for EUNLOCK to figure out why they've been > invoked. > > Would it be possible to add an optional argument to dlm_unlock() > for the AST routine to call when the unlock completes? > If this is omitted, the existing completion AST routine is > executed. It should be simple to add an AST routine as an arg to dlm_unlock(). -- Dave Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
