Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS with ATA/IDE drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:21:23PM +0200, Erik Tews wrote:
> Was there any special reason for inventing GNBD instead of just using
> iSCSI for network storage? Is it somehow faster or more relyable?

GNBD is about 4 years old.  It's worked for a long time.  Long before
you could get an iSCSI client for Linux.

Will iSCSI get to the point where GNBD is obsolete and is dropped?
Perhaps.

-- 
Ken Preslan <kpreslan@xxxxxxxxxx>


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux