On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 01:55:41PM -0800, inwardvessel <inwardvessel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@xxxxxxxxx> > > Instead of accessing the target lock directly via global var, access it > indirectly in the form of a new parameter. Also change the ordering of > the parameters to be consistent with the related per-cpu locking > function _cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock(). This is non-functional change serving as preparation for futher lock split. (commit message fixup)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
