On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 09:53:33AM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 05:26:04PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > > > > Another question is, does it make sense to keep BPF flushing in the > > "self" css with base stats flushing for now? IIUC BPF flushing is not > > very popular now anyway, and doing so will remove the need to support > > flushing and updating things that are not css's. Just food for thought. > > > > Oh if this simplifies the code, I would say go for it. I think we wouldn't need cgroup_rstat_ops and some of the refactoring may not be needed. It will also reduce the memory overhead, and keep it constant regardless of using BPF which is nice.
