Re: [syzbot] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in __run_timer_base (2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2/14/25 5:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:14:12PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
On 2/9/25 3:43 PM, syzbot wrote:
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    92514ef226f5 Merge tag 'for-6.14-rc1-tag' of git://git.ker..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=179453df980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=1909f2f0d8e641ce
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ed801a886dfdbfe7136d
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-92514ef2.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c4d8b91f8769/vmlinux-92514ef2.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c24ec4365966/bzImage-92514ef2.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+ed801a886dfdbfe7136d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This problem should be fixed by the following upstream patch once it is
merged into mainline.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250127013127.3913153-1-longman@xxxxxxxxxx/

AFAICT all these lockdep reports are because of an earlier warning. Fix
warning, report goes away. Notably:

         _printk+0xd5/0x120 kernel/printk/printk.c:2457
         __report_bug lib/bug.c:195 [inline]
         report_bug+0x346/0x500 lib/bug.c:219
         handle_bug+0x60/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:285
         exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:309
         asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:621
         expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1827 [inline]
IOW I think we're focusing on the wrong thing here.

Peter, are you planning to merge this patch? This is another instance where
the old way of calling wake_up_process() inside the lock critical region can
lead to deadlock.
I still don't love the Changelog, but yeah, I suppose I can pick it up.
But I see Boqun took it and I'll get it eventually.

No real hurry there I suppose.

I know my changelog is sometimes too verbose and may contain non-important information. I will try to improve that in the future.

Cheers,
Longman







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux