On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:41:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We all hate this thing and want it to go away. So not being able to use > it is a pro from where I'm at. I understand and to some extent am not a fan of it neither (we had disabled it in SUSE quite some time ago). I'd consider the remaining existing users legacy. > Sadly the replacement isn't there yet either, which makes it all really > difficult. Exactly. Thus the runtime switch is meant as a bridge for general purpose distros where a kernel is shipped pre-configured (i.e. one config where the default is non-grouped not to hinder the majority use cases). Considering the legacy usecases on distribution kernels do you oppose the chosen approach? I can work on changes if you have comments on the implementation itself. Thanks, Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature