On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:08:42PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > Additionally, using crash/drgn is not feasible for us at this time, it > requires keeping external tools on our hosts, also it requires > approval and a security review for each script before deployment in > our fleet. So it's ok to add a totally insecure kernel feature to your fleet instead? You might want to reconsider that policy decision :) good luck! greg k-h
