Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Disable cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() test if not load balancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/15/24 5:54 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
Hi Waiman,

On 14/11/24 13:19, Waiman Long wrote:
With some recent proposed changes [1] in the deadline server code,
it has caused a test failure in test_cpuset_prs.sh when a change
is being made to an isolated partition. This is due to failing
the cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() check for SCHED_DEADLINE tasks at
validate_change().
What sort of change is being made to that isolated partition? Which test
is failing from the test_cpuset_prs.sh collection? Asking because I now
see "All tests PASSED" running that locally (with all my 3 patches on
top of cgroup/for-6.13 w/o this last patch from you).

The failing test isn't an isolated partition. The actual test failure is

Test TEST_MATRIX[62] failed result check!
C0-4:X2-4:S+ C1-4:X2-4:S+:P2 C2-4:X4:P1 . . X5 . . 0 A1:0-4,A2:1-4,A3:2-4 A1:P0,A2:P-2,A3:P-1

In this particular case, cgroup A3 has the following setting before the X5 operation.

A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus: 2-4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.exclusive: 4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.effective: 4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective: 4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.partition: root

I believe this is fixed by my other change in the commit to change arguments of cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() to use effective_cpus instead as cpus_allowed may not represent what CPUs are currently used in the partition.

Cheers,
Longman





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux