On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 2:42 PM David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2024, David Rientjes wrote: > > > > > If broken down into hugetlb_2048kB and hugetlb_1048576kB on x86, for > > example, users could still do sum of memory.stat, no?> > > > > Friendly ping on this, would there be any objections to splitting the > memory.stat metrics out to be per hugepage size? My 2c is that it's extra complexity + overhead (IIUC these stats are hierarchical and hence would contribute to flushing overhead). So we should justify them with some concrete use cases if we are to add them.
