On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 13:41:31 -0500 Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello SJ, thank you for reviewing my patch!
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:03 PM SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joshua,
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:29:45 -0800 Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch introduces mem_cgroup_charge_hugetlb, which combines the
> > > logic of mem_cgroup{try,commit}_hugetlb. This reduces the footprint of
> >
> > Nit. Seems the regular expression is not technically correct?
>
> I see, I will change it expand it out to include both. What I meant to
> say is that it combines the functionality of both the functions, but
> I think there was a typo there. I will just expand it out so that it is
> more clear to readers!
Thank you :)
>
> > > +int mem_cgroup_charge_hugetlb(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp)
> >
> > Can we add a kernel-doc comment for this function? Maybe that for
> > mem_cgroup_hugetlb_try_charge() can be stolen with only small updates?
>
> Yes, I can definitely add a kernel-doc for this function. Would
> you mind expanding on the "stolen only with small updates" part?
> Do you mean that instead of writing a completely new section
> in the kernel-doc, I can just change the name of the section
> and modify small parts of the description?
You're right. I just thought that might save some of your time if that makes
sense. I don't really mind about this, so do whatever as you prefer :)
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
