Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Fix potential overflow issue when checking max_depth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michal,

On 2024/10/14 21:37, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 07:22:46AM GMT, Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It's worth mentioning that this issue is unlikely to occur in reality,
>> as it's impossible to have a depth of INT_MAX hierarchy, but should be
>> be avoided logically.
> 
> Strictly speaking the overflow would be undefined behavior (Out of curiousity --
> have you figured this out with a checker tool or code reading?)

Thanks for your review, I figured it out with code reading.


> Logically (neglecting UB), max_depth=INT_MAX would behave like intended
> (no limit).

Agreed, this is the real 'no limit'.

> 
>> Fixes: 1a926e0bbab8 ("cgroup: implement hierarchy limits")
>> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux