Hi Michal, On 2024/10/14 21:37, Michal Koutný wrote: > Hello. > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 07:22:46AM GMT, Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It's worth mentioning that this issue is unlikely to occur in reality, >> as it's impossible to have a depth of INT_MAX hierarchy, but should be >> be avoided logically. > > Strictly speaking the overflow would be undefined behavior (Out of curiousity -- > have you figured this out with a checker tool or code reading?) Thanks for your review, I figured it out with code reading. > Logically (neglecting UB), max_depth=INT_MAX would behave like intended > (no limit). Agreed, this is the real 'no limit'. > >> Fixes: 1a926e0bbab8 ("cgroup: implement hierarchy limits") >> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx>