Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] add dedicated wq for cgroup bpf and adjust WQ_MAX_ACTIVE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] add dedicated wq for cgroup bpf and adjust WQ_MAX_ACTIVE
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:56:28 -1000
Cc: lizefan.x@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, longman@xxxxxxxxxx, mkoutny@xxxxxxxx, chenridong@xxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240923114352.4001560-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20240923114352.4001560-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:43:49AM +0000, Chen Ridong wrote:
> The patch series add a dedicated workqueue for cgroup bpf destruction,
> add adjust WQ_MAX_ACTIVE from 512 to 2048.

Patchset generally looks good to me. I'll wait for an updated version
addressing Michal's comments.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] add dedicated wq for cgroup bpf and adjust WQ_MAX_ACTIVE
  - From: Chen Ridong

References:
- [PATCH v5 0/3] add dedicated wq for cgroup bpf and adjust WQ_MAX_ACTIVE
  - From: Chen Ridong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] zswap: improve memory.zswap.writeback inheritance
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Selective mitigation for trusted userspace
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] cgroup/bpf: use a dedicated workqueue for cgroup bpf destruction
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] add dedicated wq for cgroup bpf and adjust WQ_MAX_ACTIVE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux