tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git test head: a5ab7b05a3c825f23d74106f3304de7d024cff8a commit: dd46bd00ab4c00f6126794c6b52fbc87a2c5c389 [23/31] cgroup/cpuset: move relax_domain_level to cpuset-v1.c config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240831/202408311612.mQTuO946-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240831/202408311612.mQTuO946-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408311612.mQTuO946-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c: In function 'cpuset_write_s64': >> kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c:163:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpus_read_lock'; did you mean 'rcu_read_lock'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 163 | cpus_read_lock(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | rcu_read_lock >> kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c:178:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpus_read_unlock'; did you mean 'rcu_read_unlock'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 178 | cpus_read_unlock(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | rcu_read_unlock vim +163 kernel/cgroup/cpuset-v1.c 155 156 int cpuset_write_s64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, struct cftype *cft, 157 s64 val) 158 { 159 struct cpuset *cs = css_cs(css); 160 cpuset_filetype_t type = cft->private; 161 int retval = -ENODEV; 162 > 163 cpus_read_lock(); 164 cpuset_lock(); 165 if (!is_cpuset_online(cs)) 166 goto out_unlock; 167 168 switch (type) { 169 case FILE_SCHED_RELAX_DOMAIN_LEVEL: 170 retval = update_relax_domain_level(cs, val); 171 break; 172 default: 173 retval = -EINVAL; 174 break; 175 } 176 out_unlock: 177 cpuset_unlock(); > 178 cpus_read_unlock(); 179 return retval; 180 } 181 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
