Hello, On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 06:57:06PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote: ... > You could also have increased the ancestral limit (if there was any) > echo max > dlgt_grp_ns/pids.max // similarly allowed > > If you're a root (or otherwise have sufficient permissions) and you can > _see_ an ancestral cgroup, you can write to its attributes according to > permissions. Thus the delegation works via cgroup ns (in)visibility but > cgroup ns root is visible on both sides of the boundary hence the extra > check. Yeah, the intended usage scenario w/ NS delegation is that the delegatee won't be able to see the ancetral cgroups beyond the delegation point. Chen, is this from an actual usecase? If so, can you describe what's going on? Thanks. -- tejun
