Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 06:17:14 +0100
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240730050927.GC5334@ZenIV>
References: <20240730050927.GC5334@ZenIV>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 06:09:27AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
 
> Individual patches in followups; it definitely needs review and testing.

... followups sent via kernel.org account, due to git-send-email missing
on zeniv at the moment ;-/

References:
- [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: [PATCH 39/39] deal with the last remaing boolean uses of fd_file()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/39] memcg_write_event_control(): fix a user-triggerable oops
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/39] memcg_write_event_control(): fix a user-triggerable oops
Next by thread: Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux