Re: blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Boy Wu (吳勃誼) <Boy.Wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 07:43:20 +0200
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Burkov <boris@xxxxxx>, Iverlin Wang (王苳霖) <Iverlin.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <554f09bc6fc8f3b2a71b346f5e363950a1f8cb18.camel@mediatek.com>
References: <20240705075544.11315-1-boy.wu@mediatek.com> <8f3765db-842d-4568-9ac5-1bd9cab9e952@web.de> <554f09bc6fc8f3b2a71b346f5e363950a1f8cb18.camel@mediatek.com>
Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:THrU1lGh5FU=;odnaXHAtD4xNlL0C54CvnW5dGsU vi0bGEuPK7OVwPaqNt5nY/qch3F0LELkYsaF1ZUmv4PFt4fX5XmFiOw9o6a9XpPOguq2QOOG+ kVbVbnRx90tteILmOYk2VRJ9O4wW0Kt65knqOOSJEt83KoueTrMqc2WNGy6qzH2ZeGR8s1aaW FaDFs5cqbgz3upkkJMZRxItKUp4Q3t+UFPEasd82wM+Gkt5E/IfLcEi8oeSXg36PlCDc233n9 piLw9rhylMR/vWzfNmmEeN6ukRVq+Wg5zAUg2tK7daB89EXhfThnFRdtov5eKrqOP13lGpXJ5 1t3EoDH4H3N+NKNLt7EhbMXDuP6G8HOdsgRS6N9rIwNx/jryZzTK5SZP4ObWXLUI/vxiMlRAP 5O8LFZEThu97Jh2Xx0+ooSsOsIGdPOqmYtT0P0/TEIDwmjWX6NqrmzQxCmt6edTa0pwp62Kpm vhpPxQlcCn2S2gRbWDZby6oj0Zb4sHy1CaP0HbgWU5CEJWs9VrJbxiTi3apBl27iO3ntiT16L y+4WjAidinrjGY6Ub4fBmwfGgI52pjLsU7VIm9ZQqiOIWlLiwlD9iAhNLj3lDRuVAHiIjVOiy CVCalkeyyr0d1N/Ya7SHfxvsE1gaHbmtte1tHo5i/ZlbRZfmwRjF+ZTeXR5LYh9KOoNwkW7Sv +h5NxqoqTKOrBGCkKDW2d30m9V2gGUCPlt3iOIc1LOuJwqiEKP1xZ4OKvWXnB7GYWS/Gx4tkc +3Lx1l7Q+1/1SElJv36H2dK8PUifBGWySckTJPv7meWdq72Yk+3FbPZKDwQXE3rUekzhDEpe2 ErGe3j+PwwEj+ggUGfPbebp2fiueh/HwaoZ90i/cdG24g=
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

> ************* MEDIATEK Confidentiality Notice ********************
…

Please omit such information from your patches for Linux software components.
Such hints do probably not fit to communication characteristics of Linux mailing lists.

Regards,
Markus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
  - From: Boy Wu (吳勃誼)

References:
- [PATCH] blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
  - From: boy.wu
- Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
  - From: Markus Elfring
- Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
  - From: Boy Wu (吳勃誼)

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 -next] cgroup/misc: Introduce misc.peak
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
Next by thread: Re: blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]