On 7/3/24 11:33 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:13:29PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > ... >> The patch looks good to me after the atomic conversion. Sorry for bringing up >> this question so late into the discussion. Given that misc.max is available >> only for non-root cgroups, does it make sense for misc.peak too, available >> for non-root cgroups only? > > It's more tied to the usage - misc.current. For memcg, memory.current is > only on non-root cgroups, so is peak. For misc, as misc.current exists for > the root cgroup, it makes sense for .peak to be there too. > Thank you so much for explaining in the context of misc controller. -- Thanks, Kamalesh
