Re: [PATCH RFC -next 0/7] blk-iocost: support to build iocost as kernel module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC -next 0/7] blk-iocost: support to build iocost as kernel module
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:26:16 -0700
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lizefan.x@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx, yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx, yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240613014937.1326020-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20240613014937.1326020-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>

This cover letter is a little, erm, sparse.

Please explain why you want iocost as a module.  This adds a whole
lot of infrastructure for no obvious reason.

References:
- [PATCH RFC -next 0/7] blk-iocost: support to build iocost as kernel module
  - From: Yu Kuai

Prev by Date: Re: Re: [PATCH v3] cpuset: use Union-Find to optimize the merging of cpumasks
Next by Date: [linus:master] [cgroup/cpuset] 105f3fe918: kernel-selftests.cgroup.test_cpuset_prs.sh.fail
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC -next 0/7] blk-iocost: support to build iocost as kernel module
Next by thread: [PATCH] cgroup: bridge namespaces and cgroups
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux