Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/topology: optimize topology_span_sane()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 14/05/2024 à 00:01, Yury Norov a écrit :
The function may call cpumask_equal with tl->mask(cpu) == tl->mask(i),
even though cpu != i. In such case, cpumask_equal() would always return
true, and we can proceed to the next CPU immediately.

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 99ea5986038c..eb9eb17b0efa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ static bool topology_span_sane(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
  	 * breaks the linking done for an earlier span.
  	 */
  	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
-		if (i == cpu)
+		if (i == cpu || tl->mask(cpu) == tl->mask(i))
  			continue;
  		/*
  		 * We should 'and' all those masks with 'cpu_map' to exactly

Hi,

does it make sense to pre-compute tl->mask(cpu) outside the for_each_cpu()?

CJ




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux