Hi, On 2024/4/18 10:02, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:13:59AM +0000, Xiu Jianfeng wrote: >> From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Currently cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all() will be called when releasing >> cgroup even if the cgroup is on default hierarchy, however it doesn't >> make any sense for v2 to destroy pidlist of v1. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c >> index 520a11cb12f4..46d89157d558 100644 >> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c >> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c >> @@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all(struct cgroup *cgrp) >> { >> struct cgroup_pidlist *l, *tmp_l; >> >> + if (cgroup_on_dfl(cgrp)) >> + return; > > Can you move the test to the caller? Sure, will do in v2. > > Thanks. >