On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 20:24 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote: > > Again, IMHO having CONFIG_CGROUP_SGX_EPC here is ugly, because it > > doesn't even > > match the try_charge() above, which doesn't have the > > CONFIG_CGROUP_SGX_EPC. > > > > If you add a wrapper in "epc_cgroup.h" > > > Agree. but in sgx.h so sgx_epc_page struct is not exposed in epc_cgroup.h. I am fine with any place that suits.
