On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 01:06:27PM -0800, Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +static int sgx_epc_cgroup_alloc(struct misc_cg *cg);
> +
> +const struct misc_res_ops sgx_epc_cgroup_ops = {
> + .alloc = sgx_epc_cgroup_alloc,
> + .free = sgx_epc_cgroup_free,
> +};
> +
> +static void sgx_epc_misc_init(struct misc_cg *cg, struct sgx_epc_cgroup *epc_cg)
> +{
> + cg->res[MISC_CG_RES_SGX_EPC].priv = epc_cg;
> + epc_cg->cg = cg;
> +}
This is a possibly a nit pick but I share it here for consideration.
Would it be more prudent to have the signature like
alloc(struct misc_res *res, struct misc_cg *cg)
so that implementations are free of the assumption of how cg and res are
stored?
Thanks,
Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
