Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] cgroup/misc: Add per resource callbacks for CSS events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:25:59 -0600, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon Oct 30, 2023 at 8:20 PM EET, Haitao Huang wrote:
From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The misc cgroup controller (subsystem) currently does not perform
resource type specific action for Cgroups Subsystem State (CSS) events:
the 'css_alloc' event when a cgroup is created and the 'css_free' event
when a cgroup is destroyed.

Define callbacks for those events and allow resource providers to
register the callbacks per resource type as needed. This will be
utilized later by the EPC misc cgroup support implemented in the SGX
driver.

Also add per resource type private data for those callbacks to store and
access resource specific data.

Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
V6:
- Create ops struct for per resource callbacks (Jarkko)
- Drop max_write callback (Dave, Michal)
- Style fixes (Kai)
---
 include/linux/misc_cgroup.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 kernel/cgroup/misc.c        | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/misc_cgroup.h b/include/linux/misc_cgroup.h
index e799b1f8d05b..5dc509c27c3d 100644
--- a/include/linux/misc_cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/misc_cgroup.h
@@ -27,16 +27,30 @@ struct misc_cg;

 #include <linux/cgroup.h>

+/**
+ * struct misc_operations_struct: per resource callback ops.
+ * @alloc: invoked for resource specific initialization when cgroup is allocated. + * @free: invoked for resource specific cleanup when cgroup is deallocated.
+ */
+struct misc_operations_struct {
+	int (*alloc)(struct misc_cg *cg);
+	void (*free)(struct misc_cg *cg);
+};

Maybe just misc_operations, or even misc_ops?


With Michal's suggestion to make ops per-resource-type, I'll rename this misc_res_ops (I was following vm_operations_struct as example)

+
 /**
  * struct misc_res: Per cgroup per misc type resource
  * @max: Maximum limit on the resource.
  * @usage: Current usage of the resource.
  * @events: Number of times, the resource limit exceeded.
+ * @priv: resource specific data.
+ * @misc_ops: resource specific operations.
  */
 struct misc_res {
 	u64 max;
 	atomic64_t usage;
 	atomic64_t events;
+	void *priv;

priv is the wrong patch, it just confuses the overall picture heere.
please move it to 04/12. Let's deal with the callbacks here.


Ok

+	const struct misc_operations_struct *misc_ops;
 };

misc_ops would be at least consistent with this, as misc_res also has an
acronym.


 /**
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/misc.c b/kernel/cgroup/misc.c
index 79a3717a5803..d971ede44ebf 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/misc.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/misc.c
@@ -383,23 +383,37 @@ static struct cftype misc_cg_files[] = {
 static struct cgroup_subsys_state *
 misc_cg_alloc(struct cgroup_subsys_state *parent_css)
 {
+	struct misc_cg *parent_cg, *cg;
 	enum misc_res_type i;
-	struct misc_cg *cg;
+	int ret;

 	if (!parent_css) {
-		cg = &root_cg;
+		parent_cg = cg = &root_cg;
 	} else {
 		cg = kzalloc(sizeof(*cg), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!cg)
 			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		parent_cg = css_misc(parent_css);
 	}

 	for (i = 0; i < MISC_CG_RES_TYPES; i++) {
 		WRITE_ONCE(cg->res[i].max, MAX_NUM);
 		atomic64_set(&cg->res[i].usage, 0);
+ if (parent_cg->res[i].misc_ops && parent_cg->res[i].misc_ops->alloc) {
+			ret = parent_cg->res[i].misc_ops->alloc(cg);
+			if (ret)
+				goto alloc_err;

The patch set only has a use case for both operations defined - any
partial combinations should never be allowed.

To enforce this invariant you could create a set of operations (written
out of top of my head):

static int misc_res_init(struct misc_res *res, struct misc_ops *ops)
{
	if (!misc_ops->alloc) {
		pr_err("%s: alloc missing\n", __func__);
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	if (!misc_ops->free) {
		pr_err("%s: free missing\n", __func__);
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	res->misc_ops = misc_ops;
	return 0;
}

static inline int misc_res_alloc(struct misc_cg *cg, struct misc_res *res)
{
	int ret;

	if (!res->misc_ops)
		return 0;
	
	return res->misc_ops->alloc(cg);
}

static inline void misc_res_free(struct misc_cg *cg, struct misc_res *res)
{
	int ret;

	if (!res->misc_ops)
		return 0;
	
	return res->misc_ops->alloc(cg);
}

Now if anything has misc_ops, it will also always have *both* callback,
and nothing half-baked gets in.

The above loops would be then:

	for (i = 0; i < MISC_CG_RES_TYPES; i++) {
		WRITE_ONCE(cg->res[i].max, MAX_NUM);
		atomic64_set(&cg->res[i].usage, 0);
		ret = misc_res_alloc(&parent_cg->res[i]);
		if (ret)
			goto alloc_err;

Cleaner and better guards for state consistency. In 04/12 you need to
then call misc_res_init() instead of direct assignment.

BR, Jarkko

Will combine these with the use of a static operations array suggested by Michal.

Thanks
Haitao




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux