Hello, >From cgroup POV, it generally looks fine to me. As before, I'm really curious whether this is something other non-intel drivers can get behind. Just one nit. On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 05:07:19PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > * Allowing per DRM card configuration and queries is deliberatly left out but > it is compatible in principle with the current proposal. > > Where today we have, for drm.weight: > > 100 > > We can later extend with: > > 100 > card0 80 > card1 20 > > Similarly for drm.stat: > > usage_usec 1000 > card0.usage_usec 500 > card1.usage_usec 500 These dont't match what blkcg is doing. Please use nested keyed format instead. Thanks. -- tejun
