Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcg: optimize stats flushing for latency and accuracy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/13/23 03:38, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
Stats flushing for memcg currently follows the following rules:
- Always flush the entire memcg hierarchy (i.e. flush the root).
- Only one flusher is allowed at a time. If someone else tries to flush
   concurrently, they skip and return immediately.
- A periodic flusher flushes all the stats every 2 seconds.

The reason this approach is followed is because all flushes are
serialized by a global rstat spinlock. On the memcg side, flushing is
invoked from userspace reads as well as in-kernel flushers (e.g.
reclaim, refault, etc). This approach aims to avoid serializing all
flushers on the global lock, which can cause a significant performance
hit under high concurrency.

This approach has the following problems:
- Occasionally a userspace read of the stats of a non-root cgroup will
   be too expensive as it has to flush the entire hierarchy [1].
- Sometimes the stats accuracy are compromised if there is an ongoing
   flush, and we skip and return before the subtree of interest is
   actually flushed. This is more visible when reading stats from
   userspace, but can also affect in-kernel flushers.

This patch aims to solve both problems by reworking how flushing
currently works as follows:
- Without contention, there is no need to flush the entire tree. In this
   case, only flush the subtree of interest. This avoids the latency of a
   full root flush if unnecessary.
- With contention, fallback to a coalesced (aka unified) flush of the
   entire hierarchy, a root flush. In this case, instead of returning
   immediately if a root flush is ongoing, wait for it to finish
   *without* attempting to acquire the lock or flush. This is done using
   a completion. Compared to competing directly on the underlying lock,
   this approach makes concurrent flushing a synchronization point
   instead of a serialization point. Once  a root flush finishes, *all*
   waiters can wake up and continue at once.
- Finally, with very high contention, bound the number of waiters to the
   number of online cpus. This keeps the flush latency bounded at the tail
   (very high concurrency). We fallback to sacrificing stats freshness only
   in such cases in favor of performance.

This was tested in two ways on a machine with 384 cpus:
- A synthetic test with 5000 concurrent workers doing allocations and
   reclaim, as well as 1000 readers for memory.stat (variation of [2]).
   No significant regressions were noticed in the total runtime.
   Note that if concurrent flushers compete directly on the spinlock
   instead of waiting for a completion, this test shows 2x-3x slowdowns.
   Even though subsequent flushers would have nothing to flush, just the
   serialization and lock contention is a major problem. Using a
   completion for synchronization instead seems to overcome this problem.

- A synthetic stress test for concurrently reading memcg stats provided
   by Wei Xu.
   With 10k threads reading the stats every 100ms:
   - 98.8% of reads take <100us
   - 1.09% of reads take 100us to 1ms.
   - 0.11% of reads take 1ms to 10ms.
   - Almost no reads take more than 10ms.
   With 10k threads reading the stats every 10ms:
   - 82.3% of reads take <100us.
   - 4.2% of reads take 100us to 1ms.
   - 4.7% of reads take 1ms to 10ms.
   - 8.8% of reads take 10ms to 100ms.
   - Almost no reads take more than 100ms.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CABWYdi0c6__rh-K7dcM_pkf9BJdTRtAU08M43KO9ME4-dsgfoQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJD7tka13M-zVZTyQJYL1iUAYvuQ1fcHbCjcOBZcz6POYTV-4g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAAPL-u9D2b=iF5Lf_cRnKxUfkiEe0AMDTu6yhrUAzX0b6a6rDg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

[weixugc@xxxxxxxxxx: suggested the fallback logic and bounding the
number of waiters]

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/memcontrol.h |   4 +-
  mm/memcontrol.c            | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
  mm/vmscan.c                |   2 +-
  mm/workingset.c            |   8 ++-
  4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 11810a2cfd2d..4453cd3fc4b8 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static inline unsigned long lruvec_page_state_local(struct lruvec *lruvec,
  	return x;
  }
-void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void);
+void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
  void mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(void);
void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ static inline unsigned long lruvec_page_state_local(struct lruvec *lruvec,
  	return node_page_state(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), idx);
  }
-static inline void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
+static inline void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
  {
  }
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d729870505f1..edff41e4b4e7 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -588,7 +588,6 @@ mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz)
  static void flush_memcg_stats_dwork(struct work_struct *w);
  static DECLARE_DEFERRABLE_WORK(stats_flush_dwork, flush_memcg_stats_dwork);
  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, stats_updates);
-static atomic_t stats_flush_ongoing = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
  /* stats_updates_order is in multiples of MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH */
  static atomic_t stats_updates_order = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
  static u64 flush_last_time;
@@ -639,36 +638,87 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
  	}
  }
-static void do_flush_stats(void)
+/*
+ * do_flush_stats - flush the statistics of a memory cgroup and its tree
+ * @memcg: the memory cgroup to flush
+ * @wait: wait for an ongoing root flush to complete before returning
+ *
+ * All flushes are serialized by the underlying rstat global lock. If there is
+ * no contention, we try to only flush the subtree of the passed @memcg to
+ * minimize the work. Otherwise, we coalesce multiple flushing requests into a
+ * single flush of the root memcg. When there is an ongoing root flush, we wait
+ * for its completion (unless otherwise requested), to get fresh stats. If the
+ * number of waiters exceeds the number of cpus just skip the flush to bound the
+ * flush latency at the tail with very high concurrency.
+ *
+ * This is a trade-off between stats accuracy and flush latency.
+ */
+static void do_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool wait)
  {
+	static DECLARE_COMPLETION(root_flush_done);
+	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(root_flusher_lock);
+	static DEFINE_MUTEX(subtree_flush_mutex);
+	static atomic_t waiters = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+	static bool root_flush_ongoing;
+	bool root_flusher = false;
+
+	/* Ongoing root flush, just wait for it (unless otherwise requested) */
+	if (READ_ONCE(root_flush_ongoing))
+		goto root_flush_or_wait;
+
  	/*
-	 * We always flush the entire tree, so concurrent flushers can just
-	 * skip. This avoids a thundering herd problem on the rstat global lock
-	 * from memcg flushers (e.g. reclaim, refault, etc).
+	 * Opportunistically try to only flush the requested subtree. Otherwise
+	 * fallback to a coalesced flush below.
  	 */
-	if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_ongoing) ||
-	    atomic_xchg(&stats_flush_ongoing, 1))
+	if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg) && mutex_trylock(&subtree_flush_mutex)) {
+		cgroup_rstat_flush(memcg->css.cgroup);
+		mutex_unlock(&subtree_flush_mutex);
  		return;
+	}

If mutex_trylock() is the only way to acquire subtree_flush_mutex, you don't really need a mutex. Just a simple integer flag with xchg() call should be enough.

Cheers,
Longman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux