On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 01:57:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:51:12AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 02:50:16PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > Change the notation from pointer-to-array to pointer-to-pointer. > > > With this, we avoid the compiler complaining about trying > > > to access a region of size zero as an argument during function > > > calls. > > > > Haha, I thought the functions were actually accessing the memory. This can't > > be an intended behavior on the compiler's side, right? > > I think it's a result of inlining -- the compiler ends up with a case > where it looks like it might be possible to index a zero-sized array, > but it is "accidentally safe". Ah I see. It's not that the compiler knows that ** access is safe. It's more that it only applies the check on arrays. Is that right? Gustavo, I don't mind the patch but can you update the patch description a bit explaining a bit more on what's going on with the complier? It doesn't have to be the full explanation but it'd be useful to explicitly point out that we're just working around the compiler being a bit silly. Thanks. -- tejun
