Re: [PATCH -next v2] block: remove init_mutex and open-code blk_iolatency_try_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 07:29:28PM +0800, Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

I like this bottom line.

> @@ -861,7 +838,16 @@ static ssize_t iolatency_set_limit(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>  
>  	blkg_conf_init(&ctx, buf);
>  
> -	ret = blk_iolatency_try_init(&ctx);
> +	ret = blkg_conf_open_bdev(&ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * blk_iolatency_init() may fail after rq_qos_add() succeeds which can
> +	 * confuse iolat_rq_qos() test. Make the test and init atomic.
> +	 */

Perhaps add here
	lockdep_assert_held(ctx.bdev->bd_queue->rq_qos_mutex);

because without that the last sentence of the comment misses the
context.

> +	if (!iolat_rq_qos(ctx.bdev->bd_queue))
> +		ret = blk_iolatency_init(ctx.bdev->bd_disk);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out;

Thanks,
Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux