On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:25:38AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: > @@ -582,9 +582,9 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root, > /* > * There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim. > * We are special casing this specific case here because > - * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep > - * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for > - * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is > + * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection calculation is not robust enough > + * to keep the protection invariant for calculated effective values > + * for parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is > * especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU) > * which would want to have effective values 0 for targeted reclaim > * but a different value for external reclaim. This reads a little awkwardly now. How about: * We are special casing this specific case here because - * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep + * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection is not robust enough to keep * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
