Re: [PATCH] blk-iocost: fix seq_printf compile type mismatch error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/17/23 13:49, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 09:18:52AM -0500, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
From: amd <amd@localhost.localdomain>

Fix two type mismatch errors encountered while compiling blk-iocost.c with
GCC version 13.1.1 that involved constant operator WEIGHT_ONE. Cast the
result of the division operation to (unsigned int) to match the expected
format specifier %u in two seq_printf invocations.

Can you detail the warnings? Was that on 32bit compiles?

The concrete error was: "format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned
int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’". If I run:

$ echo | cpp -dM | grep __LP64__
#define __LP64__ 1

which makes me believe it is not 32 bits.


Thanks.


Thanks,
Carlos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux