Re: [PATCH v3 02/28] x86/sgx: Add EPC page flags to identify owner type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon Jul 17, 2023 at 12:41 PM UTC, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed Jul 12, 2023 at 11:01 PM UTC, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Two types of owners, 'sgx_encl' for VA pages and 'sgx_encl_page' for other,
> > can be stored in the union field in sgx_epc_page struct introduced in the
> > previous patch.
>
> This would be easier to follow:
>
> "Two types of owners of struct_epc_page, 'sgx_encl' for VA pages and
> 'sgx_encl_page' can be stored in the previously introduced union field."
>
> > When cgroup OOM support is added in a later patch, the owning enclave of a
> > page will need to be identified. Retrieving the sgx_encl struct from a
> > sgx_epc_page will be different if the page is a VA page vs. other enclave
> > pages.
> >
> > Add 2 flags which will identify the type of the owner and apply them
> > accordingly to newly allocated pages.
>
> This would be easier to follow:
>
> "OOM support for cgroups requires that the owner needs to be identified
> when selecting pages from the unreclaimable list. Address this by adding
> flags for identifying the owner type."
>
> It is better to carry the story a little bit forward than say that a
> subsequent patch will require this :-) I.e. enough to get at least a
> rough idea what is going on.

Oops, sent by mistake. I was going to say that the flag would be better
named simply as SGX_EPC_OWNER_PAGE instead of SGX_EPC_OWNER_ENCL_PAGE.

BR, Jarkko




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux