On 6/1/23 5:10 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 19:40 +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
Now with the previous patch, __sk_mem_raise_allocated() considers
the memory pressure of both global and the socket's memcg on a func-
wide level,
Since the "previous patch" (aka "sock: Consider memcg pressure when
raising sockmem") has been dropped in this series revision, I guess
this patch should be dropped, too?
Yes indeed, these two patches should go together. Sorry for my
carelessness.
Is this targeting the 'net-next' tree or the 'net' one? please specify
the target tree into the subj line. I think we could consider net-next
for this series, given the IMHO not trivial implications.
Got it, I will resend this series based on net-next.
Thanks!
Abel
